Did this mythological character really have a wife?

I dislike religious historians. I can’t for the life of me fathom how any of these men and women can take their profession seriously when they have so much invested in their beliefs. Who among them is willing to question the historicity of their own God? Even if they are, can we trust the blinders of faith won’t simply make it impossible for them to be objective?

For an example of what I’m talking about, take this recent finding from Harvard professor Karen L. King: she claims to have found a 4th century note from Coptic (Egyptian) Christians that make mention of Jesus having a wife. There’s yet to be any actual testing on the piece of papyrus, but already King and her team are convinced of its authenticity.

Even if it did originate from that time period, so what? This is yet another example of third, fourth accounts being taken as fact. If you’ve ever spent 5 minutes analyzing human behavior, you quickly realize most of us aren’t really interested in facts or truth. We’re all too busy trying to make the world fit into OUR vision, and that means the inconvenience of reality often means it’s entirely left out of our conversations. I don’t see much scholarly debate over whether or not Amon Ra had a wife, and he too came to Earth to help the poor and oppressed. There’s a trend to all legends, you see, and the fact that people try to inject this Jesus guy into real history only proves how poor their scholarship actually is.

What I find frustrating in all of this is even people skeptical of this new ‘finding’ fail to apply the same level of skepticism to everything else. Take a quote from this Christian who seems entirely confused abut what ‘attested historical figure’ actually means:

Jesus may be one of the best attested figures in the ancient world, but we still know hardly anything about him. And because he is the key figure in the largest religion in the world, we are keen to fill in the blanks…

The truth of the matter is that we don’t know what Jesus looked like. We don’t know where he was or what he was doing when he turned 18. And we don’t know if he was ever married or divorced.

What he looked like or if he had a wife is only the tip of this ignorance iceberg. When was this supposed messiah born? When did people start writing about him? Does it not seem suspicious to these folks that even many early Christians believed he was simply an allegory? The author admits there were plenty of religious frauds all too happy to fabricate evidence. Why is it so difficult to think the same is true for his historicity?

How many more times do we have to read dubious articles about finding Jesus’ tomb or some supposed piece of his actual cross. You might as well claim you found Hercules’ resting place as far as I’m concerned.

Evolution is a lie because dogs have never been on the moon

Truly there is no greater comedic bastion than Facebook. It’s the only place you can find such a high concentration of crazy outside of the Phelps compound. The combination of free expression and ignorance is a constant reminder that as a species, we still have a long way to go. Every once in a while, someone crafts an argument so brilliant, you just have to stand back in awe at the inspired mind that came up with it. This is not one of those:

Here we go. God created humans. God created angels to look after humans (guardian angels). Lucifer and many other didn’t want to look after that was inferior to them. They revolted, they fell. Today we call them demons. They have many forms and manifestations, including us. (We were made in God’s image. Hence He already knew He has to build a vessel in which He could put His soul into, Yeshua.) So you have these spirits, Lucifer and his crew influencing all kinds of events. Wars, murders, ect [sic] . Mind you humans are actually the one [sic] who do they [sic] work. They carry out the plan.

Why does Satan sound more like Danny Ocean? Idiots, can’t you see all of the evidence of God’s creation all around you already? Sure, giving God credit means you have to ignore all of the really unpleasant shit that incorporates nature (like parasites and viruses), but these were probably a product of gay marriage anyway (if they can cause a flood, surely they can cause all kinds of other disasters). And who is behind all of this confusion? Why, it’s Satan of course!

How many times have you done something because someone mentioned it to you. Doesn’t have to be anything bad per se, could be “Hey I like cheeseburgers. Wow I’ve never tasted those before that’s good!” Now Lucifer’s (Satan’s) plan is to convince people there is no God, that he himself doesn’t exist, and then when you die, you simply die. Everything God does, Satan does the complete opposite.

Shit, I’m confused. If he does the opposite of God, does that mean he tried to save all of those innocent Jews that God arbitrarily kills for not obeying his commands? If he’s such a thorn in God’s side, why isn’t Hell just a sweet alternative to Heaven? Playing dungeon keeper sure makes him seem more like a minion than a supreme lord of darkness, doesn’t it? Also, I want to eat a cheeseburger right now.

There are some false sciences being taught every day. Like evolution. The biggest lie ever told. There is no proof of it existing ANYWHERE. Proof of God? I’m glad you asked. It’s everywhere, just look animals, plants, HUMANS, by saying that we are a product of evolution is a) Blasphemy, b) you’re not giving yourself and intelligence enough credit. you ever see a dog make it to the moon? Oh by the way, your ancestor was a rock….Friends! I know I’ve been bold before, no ones[sic] perfect.

Dogs can’t go to the moon, therefore evolution is a lie. Take that, science!

But the message is simply this: if we continue to live the lives we’re living we will not be able to be born after we die here on Earth understand? We don’t get the keys to Heaven. Which is unlike anybody has any idea about. Unexplainable [sic]. Only two places, Heaven and Hell, both very real places. They will be just as physical! Hell simply is the furthest place from God, complete seperation [sic]. That heart breaking feeling after a break-up….It’ll be like that times 100, maybe worse. So here’s the point of this statement. It can clearly be found in the book of John, chapter 3 verse 16. Go look it up if you don’t know it!

That’s the “God so loved the world that he sent his son to have a really bad weekend for all of our sins” one that football fans are so proud of. Never mind how morally repulsive it is to think that a loving God solves all of his problems by killing something innocent; it’s not really a very impressive ‘sacrifice’ if the thing you kill doesn’t stay dead. This hell idea, the supposed place furthest away from this malevolent deity, is starting to sound more and more attractive, isn’t it?

CHRIST to OUR place on the cross. He said I’ll get us out of here and save us all. Without his resurrection, we’d be wasting our time. But he died AND came back. So, that alone makes it worth living and dying for him. Jesus loves you, no excuses.

Jesus loves you, but his Dad thinks you’re a gigantic piece of shit that deserves to be crucified for the things your imaginary ancestor did. What a swell guy! Can’t you feel his suffocating love surrounding you like a thick smog of poisonous gas?

Dr. Pepper ad upsets Christians

My friends and loved ones will testify to my undying love of Dr. Pepper. I like the taste, I like the logo, and for a while, I even had a Dr. Pepper background on my x-box. You could say I was a little obsessed with the drink, to say the least.

Now I’m officially in love, considering the fact that the company’s new ad – featuring a monkey evolving into a man after having found a can of Dr. Pepper – has upset fundamentalist Christians every time someone doesn’t credit Jesus for everything in the Universe. The Facebook post is still generating discussion, with comments sitting somewhere in excess of 3k.

Much of the early discussion was dominated by a Christian troll by the name of Amy, who was filled with powerful gems of insight:

so all you people seem to think that moon has a gravity… have you been there, didn’t think so. just like your other theories. you were a human when you were born and you are still a human. Monkies [sic] stay monkies [sic]  humans stay humans. evolution is same if I claimed that an apple will in time turn in to a pineapple, but in fact it will just rot. think about that

If anyone didn’t get it before, i will never again drink dr. pepper. in fact i will go shoplift some and pour it on the ground, take that atheists. i did like it before but this is just wrong. the children will grow up to be stupid if they’re surrounded by this kind of media.

You’ll be happy to know the vast majority of the comments are actually making fun of these idiots and their inability to grasp reality. The Internet is, after all, dominated by Godless heathens like yourself. So, if you’re looking for a laugh, go read some of these comments yourself.

Did I mention this Amy chick also has a crazy website I’ll be making fun of in my next post?

Who wants to make 8k in gold bullion from this moron?

There’s a part of me (a small one, I assure you) that admires the conviction of creationists. They, at least, are honest about the fact that the science of evolution is a pretty huge slap in the face to the notion of a creator God. Not only does it completely invalidate their silly mythology, it also clearly indicates that human beings are a product of descent with modification, and not some special creation of a sky daddy.

Of course, my ‘admiration’ quickly fades when I’m forced to listen to their inane, pathetic arguments. Most fall in the category of “evolution is bad science” or “just a theory”, with proponents convinced that every single scientist is really just another faithful idiot like themselves. There’s rarely any attempt to actually argue the evidence, since none of these clowns actually understand any of it.

This presents a problem for creationists bent on removing evolution from science classrooms. Enter Tom Ridder, a former high school chemistry teacher who gained some notoriety a few months back when he sued the Blue Mountain School District in Pennsylvania for teaching evolution, which he argued amounted to teaching atheism, which this idiot thinks is a religion.

You see evolution is bad science. It proposes that sexual species can evolve and that the human brain evolved from lower forms. Neither has been shown to be even possible, no one was there to see this “evolution” even if this did happen, and the fossil record is no help. Therefore the only objective approach to evolution is to say, “Maybe; maybe not. I do not actually know”.

Maybe in the 19th century – when Evolution was still finding its legs – could you claim with any scientific credibility that we “did not know”. But with the discovery of millions of fossils, DNA, and the various other sciences which all converge together, the weight of the evidence for evolution is so great you’d have to be a complete ignoramus to claim that we still “do not know”. Speaking of ignoramus…

But most evolutionists do not say this. To the contrary they declare that evolution is a fact. Some science! They say this because they cannot fathom a Creator had a hand. And no Creator means there can be no God. Thus most evolutionists are Atheists.

Only a man blinded by his religion could say something this dumb. Sure, most scientists who study evolution will admit to irreligiosity, but this is actually a consequence of their field of study. The notion of a creator God (especially one who supposedly cares about us) evaporates rather rapidly when you study infectious diseases and parasites.

So what is this guy’s deal, exactly?

To prove this claim [that atheism is a religion], I challenge anyone in the continental USA who teaches middle school science or above, anyone running for state or federal office, or anyone who is big in the evolution community to debate the following:

Evolution is Bad Science. I, of course, will defend the affirmative.

Additionally, this debate is to take place before a jury of previously undecided people and each debater is to place five (5) ounces of pure gold in escrow, the winner, as determined by the jury, to take the pot.

Who exactly is supposed to make up this jury? Also, since when do ‘juries’ decide whether or not something is true in science? I think this guy just wants to play the odds. In America, less than half of the population believes in evolution (and roughly 10 percent also think the sun revolves around the earth). With odds this good, it plays to bank on the ignorance of your fellow Americans.

So, who wants to take this moron up on his offer?

Rev. Benedict Groeschel apologizes for brief moment of honesty

Every once in while, a church leader will say something he actually thinks, and we’re given a snapshot into the mental lives of priests. As most of you can guess, it isn’t usually a pretty picture: religions are an old boys’ club that places fraternity over morality. This has allowed an institution like the Catholic Church to continue to harbor and defend child rapists. Even if you’ve never forced yourself on innocent kids, being part of this club warps your mind to such an extent, you actually try and defend the actions of these scumbags and instead try to blame the kids, who must have been seducing those poor priests all along, as was the case with Rev. Benedict Groeschel:

“Suppose you have a man having a nervous breakdown, and a youngster comes after him. A lot of the cases, the youngster — 14, 16, 18 — is the seducer…Well, it’s not so hard to see — a kid looking for a father and didn’t have his own — and they won’t be planning to get into heavy-duty sex, but almost romantic, embracing, kissing, perhaps sleeping but not having intercourse or anything like that…”

It’s those damn sexy kids: they can’t stop flaunting their under-developed asses in everyone’s face. Just like a girl wearing a revealing outfit in public, she’s obviously just asking to be assaulted. Why else would she dress like that?

Needless to say, when word got out that this dude was also trying to defend people who rape innocent kids, Groeschel did his best to appear apologetic. It didn’t go so well:

“I did not intend to blame the victim,” the Rev. Benedict Groeschel, of the Franciscan Friars of the Renewal, said Thursday. “A priest (or anyone else) who abuses a minor is always wrong and is always responsible.”

Hard to trust a guy who comes to the defense of anyone who molests kids, isn’t it? Has anyone given any thought to the victims of this seduction? Who will defend the Sanduskys of the future? Groeschel sure has:

“Here’s this poor guy – Sandusky – it went on for years. Interesting: Why didn’t anyone say anything? Apparently, a number of kids knew about it and didn’t break the ice. Well, you know, until recent years, people did not register in their minds that it was a crime. It was a moral failure, scandalous; but they didn’t think of it in terms of legal things.”

See, the abuse didn’t get reported because all those sexy kids really just wanted it… but of course he’s not trying to blame the victim. No sir, not one bit. I totally buy your apology, asshole, and apparently so does the man who defends the indefensible, Bill Donohue. He blamed Groeschel’s age and a recent car accident. Not sure how any of these things make you a rape apologist, but what do I know?

Rabbis won’t stop spreading herpes to babies

As Germany and the Netherlands consider banning the barbaric and totally useless practice of ‘male circumcision’ (a better word is simply genital mutilation), they face mounting resistance from religious groups who accuse them of anti-Semitism or other such nonsense. While the WHO claims it can help lower the spread of HIV, the actual supporting figures are pretty weak, and may actually lead to risky behavior (given the false sense of security). Some enlightened doctors are protesting that the surgery is both unnecessary (outside of a few special cases) and in violation of their Hippocratic oath to do no harm.

‘We feel circumcision is a medically unnecessary form of surgery. The patient has to give consent, but children can’t give consent and we feel that is wrong and a violation of the child’s rights…In our code of medical ethics, it states that you must not do harm to the patient, but with this procedure this is exactly what you’re doing.”

California has already failed in its bid to protect the penises of young boys, with the Governor instead signing a law specifically PREVENTING anyone from banning the practice. Considering almost half of the male population in the US no longer has any foreskin, it seems doubtful a ban will ever come into effect. It’s so difficult, in fact, that even New York can’t stop herpes infected rabbis from killing kids with this nonsense:

“For the government to force a rabbi who’s practicing a religious act to tell his congregants it’s dangerous is totally unacceptable,” Niederman told The Post.
“You’re forcing the mohel and the parent to sign a piece of paper that contradicts their religious convictions.”

Yet another group of dangerous morons trying to claim their religious convictions are more important than the life of the kids they put at risk. In the 21st century, it’s still controversial to even attempt to stop herpes infested mouths from touching the mutilated penises of young infants. You can officially be depressed now.

Leo Igwe interview transcript

Jake: Today I have a very special guest, someone who is going to join me to talk about the problem of child witches in Africa as well as the conflation of religion and superstition in that region. I wanted to ask someone who has had their feet on the ground here, because, you know, I am an isolated blogger and I want to make sure that I am not just saying false information and with this in mind, I invited Leo Igwe to come on the show. He is a former representative of the International Humanist and Ethical Union and he also created the Nigerian Humanist Movement.
Thank you for joining me, Leo.

Leo: Thank you so much

Jake: The first thing I wanted to discuss is that you are currently in Germany studying witchcraft accusation. Is that correct? Is this the title of the degree that you are studying?

Leo: Yes, actually, it is a doctoral degree. It is the topic of my research is witchcraft accusation in Africa. I am going to do my field work in Ghana.

Jake: How long have you actually been tackling the issue of child witchcraft and witchcraft accusation in Africa?

Leo: I have been doing that actively, let’s say, a decade – a decade and a half, the issue of witchcraft is a problem that has been with me all my life. I grew up in a witch believing community, and I grew up in a community which accusations were rampant, and these caused a lot of problems between families, within families, and as I was growing up I felt that because of what I saw and experienced as a young person I felt I devoted much of my time to understandng this phenomena and helping my society address it.

Jake: How do generally people respond, like say the average population, to witchcraft? Like is it just either you believe in it firmly or you kind of still support it or is it divided in terms of belief?

Leo: Well, you know it is always difficult to measure this belief. There is not something you can put on somebody’s head, or whatever, to gauge to what extent a person believes. You only can measure that, maybe there is a manifestation. But what is a reaction of the majority of the population here, here, and here? So immediately when you mention it, people do not want to get involved. A few people will tell you, I am not sure whether it exists or not, but I don’t want to be associated with it, but majority, most people in my country, in my continent, that believe in it, there is what they call the reality, that witchcraft exists, witchcraft is real. This is something you hear many people say. That reality is something that people have embraced, and they find difficult to really question, they find it difficult to really listen to any other viewpoint that is critical of the phenomenon.

Jake: How do you, yourself, break free? Were you always a disbeliever? Because I understand that there are a portion of people who are just not easily suckered into this. Were you one of those? Or did you witness something that sort of drove you to want to know more? Or did you lose your belief if you lived in a place that primarily there is fear? Why are you not fearful?

Leo: Yeah, well, I would say that as a child I was fearful because I was taught to be fearful. I was taught to be fearful. You know, like a child, you will believe your parents, you will follow the structures of your parents. And as you are growing up, you will just be breaking away from those beliefs if you want. Like I said, it is a matter of choice. As I was growing up, I was questioning some of the things my parents told me. What happened is, like I said, I grew up in it – believing witchcraft, it is poisoning relationships, people are beating up their parents, people are abandoning their children, people are torturing, murdering their children – murdering anybody suspected, anybody accused of witchcraft. So more than that, I think when I was ten years, I think, two of my cousins came to our house, to our home in the village, and they beat my father into a coma. I could not understand what happened, so I was asking my father, my father was telling me, actually he got revived, my mother went to court and all that. But as I was asking my father, tell me what happened, what did you do to merit this kind of beating and all that? Oh you are still too young to know, still too young to know. Now, as I was growing up at that point, I sat my father down and told him can you tell me exactly what happened? Oh, there was suspicions that my cousins wanted to use my mother for rituals. You know, they went to a voodoo priest, they wanted to involve my mother, eventually the plan did not work, it backfired and ?? the rumor got to him and he went and confronted them and wanted to know why they wanted to use my mother for rituals, and they were angry. They now came to our home and they told my father, they insisted my father should tell them who informed him that they wanted to use my mother for rituals. My father bluntly refused and they beat him into a coma. So, look, my father was fortunate, he lived afterwards, many people do not survive.
And I ask myself, for what? If I had told my father look, you would have ignored them. Nobody can use magic or witchcraft to kill your wife or to kill your children, it is superstition. But I am just letting you know how much a problem this belief is and how entrenched it is and so that is why I said look, as I was growing up and I discovered witchcraft belief is superstitious, and that the problems we are having in Africa, Europe was having centuries ago, and has said goodbye to it. So, because of the problems… it caused in my own family, it caused in a lot of families, people are beaten up, people have their parents beaten up, I say look, I have to understand this thing.
And as I was reading and researching I found that what was happening in my own community, in my own country, took place in Europe centuries ago. I said what! Look at it! Lo, and behold, nobody is willing to listen, nobody is ready to listen to the critical voice.
I said OK, I am going to do my best, even if I am the lonely voice in the wilderness, I will continue to speak, hopefully the change will come. But I must tell you, change is coming, but it is not coming as fast as I would want it, because I would like, I would like this to be associated with my country, with my continent, in the next decade, in the next few decades.

Jake: That’s going to be tough Leo, you must have read this, I don’t know if you did, Save the Children International, released a report on the Democratic Republic of the Congo. I did a show about this last time and they had a number of recommendations about what to do, and one of those recommendations was that they needed to work with religious leaders now, and educate them. Now I’ve been reading your articles, and what your opinion of religion is, and I want to ask you this question – do you think that is a good idea or does it legitimize an institution that is just going to do this regardless of what we tell them?

Leo: Look, the thing there is this. We cannot do this alone. We cannot always make people understand that for you to stop a witch hunt you have to be an atheist. We just have to understand that you have a message, many people will embrace easily. But let’s think about it this way, when witch hunting started in Europe, maybe ?? and got the violent complaints which brought it to an end, rebellious people, even some priests, they spoke out against it. So, as far as I am concerned, I am not ready to tell somebody you have to be an atheist or you have to be a freethinker, only that’s your business. But whatever you do, in the name of your belief, you are going to be held responsible. Period. So, the issue is this, I am ready to walk with anybody and I think that people should be, you know, who ever I am to walk with, religious people or religious organizations, and keep making them understand that this is part of the problem, our society is suffering as result of superstition. Yes, and for us, engaging and walking with them.

Jake: It does seem as little bit strange, for instance, when you were mentioning witch hunts and how that came to an end. There is an interesting, like, the Renaissance itself – part of the reason for the Renaissance is because of the humanist movement, that began as a religious movement, but the important thing to remember about that movement is that the humanists at the time, like let’s say Leonardo Da Vinci, one of the early humanists (also a vegetarian, interestingly enough) their type of religious belief, for instance, is very different, from the religious beliefs of the people they had fought. I mean, it might as well have been night and day if you really compare the two, and here is the thing that I worry about. For instance, let’s work with churches, let’s work with this problem, but if the belief really does stem from the intersection of ancient superstitious beliefs in witchcraft that weren’t always harmful and now with introduced Christianity and their violent rhetoric when it comes to that very practice, how is that supposed to be solved? Doesn’t that make the situation worse?

Leo: No, no, no, OK, yeah, like I said, I agree with you. Look, we have to understand, that this is a complex and complicated phenomenon, that’s number one.
Number two, we also have to understand that moving from faith to reason, people questioning their faith is always a slow, difficult, and challenging enterprise for many people. But what we are saying is that we cannot wait, people are dying as I’m talking to you here now, people are languishing here in camps in Ghana, in Burkina Faso, in Congo, children are dying in the streets, are we going to wait until people in Congo become atheists or freethinkers before we move into Congo to help these children? My answer is no! Are we going to wait for the people in Burkina Faso to abandon all their religions or for them to stop protesting women? And are not driving them away to die and languish in wretched camps? My answer is no! What I am saying is this, let us again, draw lessons again from the fact that the church, religious organizations in medieval era, they were a part of this. But, people also spoke out, many priests and skeptics, many bishops and skeptics.

Jake: So where are they? Where are they right now? In this conversation, where are they? Why are they so silent?

Leo: I agree, it is problematic. I agree that the church is part of the problem, but what I’m saying is this. We cannot just walk alone, we should try and find common ground, yes, we should try. I know it is difficult. Why I am saying this, is this, because there are few skeptics who are identified and open in Africa, there are few people who are ready to apply their skepticism, you know – openly and expressly – but there are also people who are skeptics, but who also hold religious beliefs. Now, what we have to do is that because this is a situation where superstition, irrational belief, is causing serious harm we all have to go all out and engage people on this platform and make sure that we keep re-addressing the fact that here is part of that problem skeptics have been talking about, here is part of the problem humanists have been talking about, let’s act from there.
We will not win this war in one day, we will not win this war in one year, we will not win this war in one century. Europe did not do that, so I am also thinking that we are not going to accomplish that automatically in Africa. It is going to take us some time, but let us keep moving, let us remember because let us not retreat because at the end of it all history is on our side. Let’s make the necessary sacrifice, at this point in time life is at stake. The life of the people are at stake, we should not stay on the table arguing whether we should engage religious people or not. Where we can engage them and save lives, please let’s engage them and save lives.

Jake: Speaking of engaging religious people, and the silence that is coming from a lot of religious institutions, which we know that their supposed humanitarian stance, for instance, should be against this, there has been silence. Here is my theory on where the silence may come from. Perhaps you can shed some light on this. I actually believe that in Africa right now it is a battleground for religious ideology, Islam and Christianity, specifically. I think the reason these religious leaders are not speaking is because they want to be popular, and to speak out against this would be unpopular and they would lose followers in what they believe is sort of the last bastion of religious growth.

Leo: Yes

Jake: So, what we are asking, is we are asking religious people to work against their interests in terms of spreading themselves, in order to save people’s lives and this is not working. Should we change the message? I don’t really understand how we can start appealing to these higher religious figures that are just so silent.

Leo: It’s like when we are talking about the issue of the use of condom, the position of the church and all that. Even when it comes to the issues of homosexuals, the rights of homosexuals and the religious opposition. We know that ten years ago, twenty years ago, these were issues that many people thought no religious group will ever respect the rights of homosexuals. But what is the vision today? Many of them are switching, many of them are changing, many of them are dragging their feet away. What I am saying is this, they cannot lead the campaign, but they will follow, yes. Because our values, the values of critical thinking have always have always revived skeptically oriented people to lead. So what I’m saying is this, we are trying to discuss this as though we have to wait for them. No! We have to lead, they will follow, yes!
I don’t know how long it will take them to follow. I don’t know the pace is left for them. But unless we think we are not convinced of our mission, unless we are not convinced of our purpose – if we are convinced, let us lead. Just like what happened when it comes to the rights of gay people. Few people came out, they spoke out. They thought that the churches would not get around to supporting them. Many churches are supporting that now. So that is something that will also happen in this case. So let us not just stay on the table debating will they follow us, will they listen to us, will they join their voices with us. No! Let us go all out. At the United Nations, at the Commonweath, international institutions, international programs. Name and shame them. Tell them to their face, you are part of this problem. I want to tell you that many people will start backing away.
It will not lead to the closure of all judges, of all unjust organizations, it will not. But I want to tell you that at least, like I said, the lives of these children, the lives of these women will be saved. We will be chipping away at the block of superstition. Like I said, it will take time. Because we have on our hands a humanitarian crisis. We have in our hands a very terrible and atrocious campaign going on, we should not spare any time debating and discussing. We should lead. They will follow at their pace.

Jake: Now what do you think about that if you look at the Renaissance and some of the violence around that time, it is a direct consequence of Enlightened movement? Because what happens is that people disagree, were pushed to extremes, and in those times, those extremes led to violence. So in a sense, the price we pay for Enlightenment is often this kind of violence. Is that not a paradox? Are we not facing more, temporarily at least, probably more of this type of atrocity as we get more involved?

Leo: Look, what is the alternative? What is the alternative? The alternative is to sit by and watch these people kill, maim, and destroy fellow human beings in the name of their misconceptions and superstitions. It has a price! And I want us to know that we aren’t going to achieve this on a platter of gold or whatever going to achieve this just like a miracle. No. We are going to pay some price. The price they paid during the Enlightenment is one we are enjoying today. And I want to tell you that everybody, including the religious institutions, are still looking back to that era of Enlightenment, even without asking themselves what role did my religious group or my religious organization or my church play, no? Yeah! I want to tell you like now, Friday we just got back to the situation in Africa, it was dangerous on the ticket. Like you must have read about the attack by Helen Ukpabio on our church members in Nigeria who were to organize a seminar.

Jake: There is a video about it. I think I posted in 2009, although I’ll be re-posting it for the interview.

Leo: Good!

Jake: I believe that Africa right now is where we should be talking, having the conversation about the Poison of Religion. I mean, I see it all the time. You had an article about Islam in Mali where kids are being forced to go begging on the streets and these madras are just raking in this money. They are exploiting children in a very real way. And child witchcraft in Africa, preachers are getting rich, exploiting these children. This is literally the exploitation of children under the guise of religion and no one is having this conversation in a mainstream way.

Leo: Yes, I want you to understand that there many religious people are outraged by this. But you see, many of them can’t speak up because of the taboo of challenging and criticizing religious leaders. That’s why I said that skeptical or irreligious individuals who are ready to go open and public, with a skeptical voice, with a skeptical perspective, they should move in, because there are religious people, if I should qualify this, some enlightened religious people, who will support them I tell you. Look, I don’t subscribe to that idea of religion, I was going thru our communities, bringing public enlightenment in Nigeria and I met people – some of them Mormon, some of the Jehovah Witness, some of them some religion or another – who came up to me and said yes, I am a Christian, I believe in God and all that but this is outrageous. Well, we will always say yes. The idea of God and the idea of witches, they are the same, they are virtually the same thing. Yes, and again what I’m saying is this. What anybody does, if people commit atrocity in the name of their belief, whether they believe in God, or believe in the occult, or believe in witch or wizard, or believe in the New Age, or believe in UFOs, or whatever you believe in, if you commit atrocities, you should be held accountable! And such beliefs should be challenged, should be critically evaluated. Thought, freedom of expression, critical thinking, free press, those are things that will help us reason the population out. Because we are talking about people, many of them are not educated, some of them have have no idea of life but just indoctrination. So they are trapped! We should reach out to these people. This is something you should tell friends, we have that capacity to exercise what I call rational compassion. Compassion that only rationally oriented people can exercise. Look, it is only we the skeptics, we critically oriented people who can help. We did it, and we called it Enlightenment, and we can do it again. I’m deeply convinced we should not spare any moments doing whatever we can to ignite a light again so that generations to come will also look back and and say yes, that was an era that started changing, that was an era that started protecting our children, that was an era that started protecting our mothers, and they will be grateful. Our names may not be mentioned, it will not be necessary but what is important is that we must help define an era. We must help ignite a light in Africa’s darkness.

Jake: I think with any movement, maybe it is arbitrary, it is important to have a catchy name. I think it’s time for the African Enlightenment. I don’t know if that’s the word, because I just came up with it, and it’s probably terrible, but you are like those early adopters of Enlightenment where you are just trying to spread it. I mean, you yourself founded the Nigerian Humanist Movement, undoubtedly with that purpose in mind. It is your aim to spread critical thinking and reason, it seems to me, in the continent, and you seem to be taking a pretty broad approach because from all the articles that I’ve been reading, you’ve traveled quite a bit.

Leo: Yes, I’ve been to so many countries. I’ve been to Senegal, Gambia, Sierra Leone, Liberia, Burkina Faso, Malawi, South Africa, Congo, not Congo Democratic Republic, the Congo, Kenya, Uganda, and all that, I think I’ve been to about 13/14 African countries.

Jake: And of those places where would you say our attention should be focused first? Or is it just sort of a generally broad it’s bad everywhere?

Leo: Well, you see, in these countries sometimes I spend a few days, a few weeks. So it is difficult for me to tell you actually what the situation means. But I must tell you one thing, I couldn’t see much of the difference between the countries because of the button. The reasoning button, the button of thinking.
Yes, there are some places here we have some very extreme situations. Like for instance, in Central Africa Republic, even I’m talking to you now, people are still in jail as a result of witchcraft because witchcraft is recognized by the law. In Malawi, only recently, women, at least fifty women were in jail, they were accused of witchcraft by children, and they were sentenced and imprisoned. Thru the campaign we launched there, we have a small Humanist group there, we were able to secure the release of over fifty women wrongfully convicted and imprisoned because of witchcraft. In Malawi, they had to believe that women can use witchcraft planes to transport children, get them initiated, and all that and all that. Some children will come to God, confess, or made to say certain things, inditing these women, and they were sent to jail, even in Nigeria. So what I’m saying here is this, this is a general problem, for me it is a social disease. It is a tragic situation and we need to start engaging in it. We should not wait for children to be driven into the streets, you know, as has been the case in the Democratic Republic of the Congo. We will not wait for women to be killed as was the case recently in Malawi, we will not wait for children to be tortured, burned, acid poured on them as was the case in Nigeria. We should not also wait and delay in speaking out against witch hunters and witch doctors like Helen Ukpabio of Nigeria and all the pastors. We should all go all out to expose witch hunters. Yes, today we have the Internet. We never had it in the past, we can send out information. We can attract the attention of the world to this problem. Today we are talking about a situation whereby recently a child was tortured to death. An African child was tortured to death, in the UK.

Jake: There are a number of them in fact. I think Scotland Yard has investigated almost one hundred cases and that is the stuff that has been reported.

Leo: Good! And I want to say that is just the tip of the iceberg. Because we extrapolated abuses that are done behind the walls, and that is why I said the world should not keep quiet over this. Because anywhere we have gotten a hundred cases, for me it multiplies by another hundred and another hundred and another hundred, because we are talking about how people express themselves or try to use it as a weapon of abuse in so many ways we cannot even track down, they use these instruments of our contemporary legal system. So, that is why I said there is need for us to go all out, to draw the attention of the world, to keep educating, to keep it in the minds of people. I know it is difficult, but it is possible.

Jake: Most of the listeners are in their car, they’re at work, they’re working out, and you know they hear these words and and they’re like, yeah, I really want to do something.
What can they do now? What is the best thing for Joe Six-pack, living in the US, who’s like this is a serious problem, how can they get involved?

Leo: Now, first of all we have to identify organizations that are doing some great jobs. The Humanist organizations are doing a great job. Some people, who for some reason or another don’t want to support the Humanist organizations, yes, they may want to support the organizations like Stepping Stones, which is a secular group. You know, Stepping Stones is best in the UK. They have partners in Nigeria, people who rescue children.

Jake: It’s very direct, kind of like you give them money, we’ll go directly to rescue these kids, no doubt about it.

Leo: Definitely. That was number one. For number two, put this in a blog. Like you said, if you put, witchcraft accusation in Africa, witch hunting in Africa, you get a lot of information. But many people, many websites are always interested in what is happening in their own county, in their own country, in what is affecting their own immediate community. But today we are living in a global world! So it is important that people know what is going on in witchcraft accusation in Africa, in central Africa. People can send letters. You can issue press release. Many people are working with international organizations – who avoid it, who avoid this problem, because it is a cultural issue. They want to respect Africans, and they don’t want to get involved and they don’t want Africans to look up to them or start saying oh, this is colonialism or impose their own thinking.
But sometimes they allow this atrocious practices, they allow this violent campaign, they allow this superstitious practices to continue, and they work with international organizations that can help us achieve something positive. So people are not just staying in their houses. Many of them are involved. Let them raise such issues! Let them make donations if they can. If they think they can volunteer their time and energy. They can also contact those who can help us in this country. We just need what they can do, and we can direct them to wherever they can help us address the problem.

Jake: How much longer do you have left in your doctoral thesis by the way? I gotta tell you, Leo, I love your passion. I think that one of the ways is to have you going over to secular conferences and and talking about this stuff because I really think you would ignite the fire under some people’s asses that definitely needs to be ignited. So how much longer are you stuck in academia?

Leo: In July I was at the James Randi conference in Vegas

Jake: Oh, You were at TAM

Leo: Yes, I was at TAM

Jake: Well, that’s great

Leo: I spoke at TAM and I also spoke at of skeptics here in Berlin and a conference of atheists in Cologne, and I just came back from the UK. I spoke at a conference at the University of Lancaster. Next week I’ll be in Denmark to discuss with an NGO who is working to set up a shelter in Nigeria and all that. So I am not trapped as such. But by next year, I’ll be going to Ghana and I’ll maintain a low profile as I try to gather information and collect data and all that. Then after all that I’ll be back to write up my summaries. So, my academic program is just a way to liberate my campaign, because sometimes you find yourself doing this work, you know and occasionally I am asleep and it gets so overwhelming and that is why I went to this university and asked the professor here if I could come over and he said fine. And I’ve been doing a lot of reading about witch hunting in Europe, buying a lot of books, deepening my knowledge and understanding, and I’m getting bolder and I’m more inspired now to do the work than even I was. Because now I know what happened here, and we are just in time. There is no argument on this case. The children have to be saved, they have to be rescued. Anyone who wants to argue should tell me why we should spend the slightest minute waiting on this case. We just have to move it. And if what I tell you in these few days is to mobilize and tell you what a problem we have and to get people to support it one way or another then I tell you I have spent these three years very well. So I just have about three years to go, but in the three years I will be traveling back and forth, granting interviews and speaking at conferences and doing whatever I can to make sure that difference we can make in the lives of the women and children in Africa, many of them are just people. We skeptics, we freethinkers, do not shy away from making that difference. That is my mission, that is my goal.

Jake: I hope you achieve that goal Leo, and I hope that you are going to come back on the show periodically and talk about this issue. You know, this is something that I’ve been fighting other people in the secular world to recognize. Even though people might recognize it, I just don’t think it has the kind of gravity that it should, and you talk about we just need to get moving on this shit. Like no more sitting in our chairs talking about it, it’s time for action. I can understand your frustration. You’re reading European history and you’re like this is just happening, this is the same crap, but at least in a sense, you have a bit of a manual for how to sort of like fix this problem. So we can get it done quicker.

Leo: Yes! We can! So we should not wait, we should not say oh, how are we going to get the churches along. Start moving! And tell them, come along, come along. Either you come along or history will leave you behind. And I want to tell you that they will come along. there are some church leaders today who are speaking against it, of course, you know there is a contradiction there, you get it. Whenever I’m engaging such people, I’m engaging something positive, in a social world. I tell them, we have other battles to fight, we can sort that out, but when it comes to political issue, such as respecting the rights of homosexuals, I work with church groups. But I know also we might disagree on some other issues like demon, demonic possession, and all that, but when it comes to this one now I tell them if you support me, come along. Then I know that with time, society will gradually be moving away. I don’t know how I’m going to do it, how I am going to force it on them, but when it comes to these clear cases of abuses, irrationalism, superstition, religious extremism, and fundamentalism we are going to lead and we will say will always tell them will you join us, can you come up, can you engage us, we are moving and we are going to save lives. We are going to start with humanity, we cannot fail them. If we fail and betray them, then I think that is the worst thing that could happen to us, not just as people, who have struggled over the years to get ourselves out of the dogma and superstition but as those who know the harm that an individual and society can suffer as a result of dogma and superstition.

Jake: Well Leo. thank you for joining me. And I have to say I am endlessly impressed by your work. You are one of the people that I think will help to create this African Enlightenment which I think is just necessary and you know what, it would benefit the rest of humanity as well. I just feel like, as if we, so much in this country, or at least in the West, everybody just ignores Africa, and I think we do that at our own detriment. These are our people! This is our ancestral home, we need to treat it with a little more respect, and we need to make sure that the human beings who are living there live in safety and security.

Leo: The one thing I need to add is this, many of the superstitions are making their way again back to the Western countries. So that is why hiding in the comforts of our homes and countries and colleges is really not the best way. And now, Helen Ukpabio wanted to organize a crusade or whatever she called it, a witchcraft deliverance and all that, in the US, in Texas.

Jake: Didn’t somebody put a stop to that? I remember there was a petition or something.

Leo: Yes. I worked with some friends in the US and the petitions were sent and campaigned and she could not make it. Yes, and what we are trying to do now, is to get people to understand, those who live in the West to understand that today, this is not just happening here. This is not just Africa’s problem, this is the problem you can’t ignore. This is happening in the UK. And I want to tell you that in Canada, the US, we cannot be totally sure that some abuses are not happening in the name of superstition, imported superstition and traditions from Africa. So that is why we all must be concerned, not just for the sake of Africa but for the sake of Enlightenment throughout the world.

Jake: Thank you for joining me Leo, and we look forward to more work from you and to having you again on the show, which I hope you’ll do.

Leo: My pleasure.

I know I shouldn’t feed this troll, but…

It’s a bad idea to feed Internet trolls, but every once in a while I get a comment on a random article that I just can’t resist writing a response to. This one appeared in an article entitled “Why is Christianity growing in China“. Here’s this clown’s answer:

It will be interesting to see atheists trying to uplift the human spirit with??? LOL, not to make fun of your beliefs dear “know it all”, but it’s been proven using the scientific method that human beings do indeed need to have their spiritual side cultivated in some way. Now you could be “spiritual but not religious”, that works for some. But there will never be a power greater then the worlds great religions that actually has the capability of lifting the most destitute, and guiding the most educated and well off of our lot. I know you don’t believe this dear atheist, but belief has nothing to do with how smart you are!

What’s his scientific proof, you ask? Well, like most religious idiots, the concept of ‘scientific proof’ is only relevant if it somehow confirms his ridiculous view of the world. In this case, it’s the idea that without a ‘spiritual’ side, there’s no way for people to feel uplifted and part of some greater whole.

What a fucking load of horseshit.

It isn’t the world of make-believe which inspires me. It’s the vastness of the universe, or the fact that the atoms which make up my body are forged of the amber of dying stars. I’m a product of over 3 billion years of evolution, one of a myriad of different lifeforms each adapted to suit their particular environment. I live on a cooling ball of rock and iron orbiting a massive collection of hydrogen, packed so tightly together that they fuse, forming helium and unleashing 3.8 x 10^33 ergs/sec of power (a number that is surprisingly easy to calculate, using only an umbrella, a tin of water, and a thermometer).

I find all of this more awe inspiring than any myth we’ve ever invented. How could we compete with the wonders of reality? In the past 80 years we’ve uncovered more about the universe than during our entire time here on Earth. There is still so much to discover and be inspired by, yet religious people keep claiming they have the monopoly on beauty and truth. The stories of Achilles and Jesus have nothing on the beauty of a supernova explosion, or an entire galaxy consumed in a Quasar.

As for intelligence having nothing to do with belief, I would venture to say while plenty of smart people can believe in some incredibly stupid and silly things, those very beliefs impact how a person thinks and acts. Steve Jobs thought alternative medicine could help his aggressive cancer. His stupid belief, while it may not have diminished his overall intelligence, affected his well being enough to terminate his life prematurely. Would anyone praise his ‘spirituality’ in this circumstance, or criticize the ridiculousness of his cherished beliefs? Had his friends and family been brave enough to call him out on it, he might still be alive, and the iPhone 5 wouldn’t suck balls.

If you want to pat yourself on the back for believing in things without evidence, that’s fine: just don’t pretend it makes you smart, guy.

Pope’s butler faces jail time for leaked memos

OK, so remember how the US finally jailed their first priest for covering up sexual abuse? We all felt as though this was a positive sign of things to come, didn’t we? Well, as great as that felt, it seems as though justice is slow in coming to the Vatican. Jailing the Pope’s butler for leaking damning memos demonstrating the extent of corruption is a bigger priority for these fuckers.

Pope Benedict XVI’s butler will be tried on an aggravated theft charge over the leaking of hundreds of secret papers from the pope’s personal apartment to an Italian journalist, a Vatican spokesman said Monday.

The butler, Paolo Gabriele, acted out of a desire to combat “evil and corruption everywhere in the Church,” according to a prosecutor in the case.

And what kind of reward do you get for trying to fight corruption in one of the oldest organizations in the world? Why, a possible 6 years in jail, that’s what!

The Vatican has promised a ‘public trial’, but it’s already pretty messed up that as a semi-sovereign state (with no actual official status) it can send their own people to jail for having the guts to try and do something about all the evil shit the Vatican does.

I do hope it’s public, since these morons don’t seem to realize the rest of the world is taking Paolo’s side. I can’t wait until you jail this man and show the world what a corrupt, malignant organization you are…

Papacy finally OKs condom use

It was only a matter of time before the millions of African men, women, and children slowly dying of AIDS would shame the Catholic Church into changing its stance on condom use. In a new book set to be released, based on conversations with the Pope, Benedict said in some cases, using a piece of rubber on your dick would not make God angry.

When he was asked if his church was against condom use, he said:

“It of course does not see it as a real and moral solution. In certain cases, where the intention is to reduce the risk of infection, it can nevertheless be a first step on the way to another, more humane sexuality.”

If you’re wondering why a sexless adult should have anything to say about sexuality, remember that the ‘humane’ interpretation of sexuality usually involves not having any. St. Paul was famous for his hatred of sexuality. As far as he was concerned, it was far better never to have sex than procreate. He saw celibacy as more pure, more divine. This sick attitude towards sex has since infested our world and made masturbation, one of life’s few enjoyments, a sin.

All of this is coming way too late. The majority of Catholics have been pro-birth control for a while now, and as usual, it’s the top brass who are late to the reform party. How many millions of people died needlessly because of some bullshit interpretation of Onan jizzing on the ground? How many unwanted babies were aborted, with their mothers bleeding to death in back alleys because of the church’s stance on contraception? Fucking ridiculous.

But wait, there’s more!

His language in attacking the use of recreational drugs in the West and its impact on the rest of the world is particularly striking.

Do they have to ruin everything that’s fun?

Christian calls atheist “mean” on Reddit

Here’s another “hey, atheists are being mean and should stop” article from someone clearly annoyed that people on Reddit have less than kind things to say about religion.

If you want to find out why I call these guys Reddit Atheists, take a brief dip into the atheism subreddit. It is a place entirely defined by bitter, faux-enlightened young people sharing “thought-provoking” images about the horrific evils of religion (in practice, pretty much just Christianity) and congratulating each other for being “enlightened.” The site was originally intended to be a place where people talk about atheistic ideas, but as is Reddit’s depressing trend, it soon devolved into a swampy mess of endless, banal clichés, memes, and general anti-intellectualism. It actually rivals Creationism in terms of having a narrow worldview.

Trying to lump us in the same category as these morons, eh? While I agree Reddit isn’t usually more than rage comics, memes and infographics, I really don’t think the online conversation about non belief is being dictated by it. It’s just a bunch of frustrated (usually) young people who have no other outlet other than an online content aggregator.

Defining your life by volatile antitheism—in other words, clinging to something you don’t believe in—isn’t just annoying, it’s actually pretty backward, and, in some cases, culturally malignant. For a demographic that spits a lot of game about equality and mobility, they sure love lording their “intellect” over anyone who dares to think differently. The atheism subreddit gets off on feeling superior to other people; it’s not about ideas or truth, they’d rather thrive on that faux-scholar buzz.

How is this culturally malignant to expose the superstition of others? Well, if your culture relies on superstition, perhaps it would. But in a world dependent on the explanatory power of science, it’s culturally malignant to hold on to Bronze Age ideas, not to debate them.

Also, this guy was so busy busy focusing on the shit he didn’t like, he forgot to read all the personal, touching shit people DO talk about. The number of times I’ve read heartbreaking stories of young kids being kicked out of their homes (one of them was Ray Comfort’s kid, BTW), or kids psychologically abused by religious parents and family members is honestly impossible to tell. The hundreds of positive comments, and support these people get is nothing short of extraordinary compared to the isolation these people would normally be faced with.

The author asked if people practicing Christianity was really that horrible for non-believers. Judging by his own story, I would say his opinion is tainted by the fact that he never lived in a religiously oppressive home. The same can not be said of many redditors. Living under the thumb of religion would make anyone frustrated, and if the worst they do is mock religion, are you honestly going to compare that to the campaigns of hatred normally directed at us?

What the article should read is simply “I don’t like Reddit”. That’s fine, it’s not for everyone. But writing an article telling people to shut up not only stinks of a kind of irony, it sends the wrong message about how conflict should be resolved: you don’t talk less, you talk more!

An open letter to Sam Harris

Perhaps I’m not the best person to offer advice on how to deal with trolls. My site gets relatively light traffic, and the people who visit tend to be way too polite, nice, or otherwise supportive. My lack of popularity in a sense has shielded me from the kind of criticism you’re regularly subjected to. Still, I feel I understand why your positions have been so vilified, and why you often find yourself outside of what the ‘atheist mainstream’ believes.

First, while I think you’re a great writer and I endlessly enjoy your prose, you don’t exactly speak the way regular people do online. Your style is more reminiscent of newspaper editorials than blogs, and in a sense, it lacks a feeling of genuineness. It almost makes one feel as though you’ve been too careful with your words. A little candidness goes a long way online, especially when you’re trying to express frustration.

Second, your controversial position on things is so nuanced, it’s difficult to actually represent it well, especially when one considers the short attention span of the Internet (I bet only a fraction of my readers will even bother to read this entire article). Even when you provide resources to properly analyze your belief, (like the link you said justifying torture that I’m still wrestling with) you’re asking what is essentially the laziest generation in the history of the planet to studiously research your position. That ain’t gonna happen.

Third, you must chose your battles. While you are undoubtedly more recognized than PZ Myers, the man has established a large online following; one that I wouldn’t dare anger. This is not a place I normally expect civil debate (and I don’t actually think it’s the intent of the site anyways). Holding PZ responsible for the things his fans say suggests the solution would be either censorship or policing, neither of which I think is a good idea.

Fourth, your experiences with a psychedelic drugs will always make you an outsider. America is so afraid of drugs, it would rather jail a huge segment of its population than allow adults to make their own decisions about their bodies. You and I both know a prohibitionist attitude is religious in nature, but it has been ingrained long enough in American culture that the default stance on recreational drugs is “drugs are bad, m’kay?”, regardless of religious affiliation.

Last but not least, your criticism of Islam will always be mistaken for racism. I know, because I get the same look from people when I say something. This vile religion has managed to convince everyone that belonging to their group somehow makes one part of a ‘race’, and criticism of this misogynist, violent culture amounts to being a modern day bigot. That’s not a label anyone enjoys, and people are willing to ignore reality if it means they won’t look bad, even at their own detriment.

I know the Internet can be a harsh place, and it lobs criticism far more than praise. Just remember that so much of the Internet is the raw, unfiltered thoughts of people who have no responsibility for the words they say. Take it with a grain of salt, man.

Where was God at the Aurora shooting?

There’s a predictable pattern to the way religious people deal with tragedy. Undoubtedly, this kind of horrific thing makes them question the dogma they’ve been spoon fed their entire life – that an omnipotent being cares for their well being, especially when it seems so senseless; the evils of the world throw this ‘loving god’ thing back in their face, and they don’t like it.

Then come the rationalizations:

Let’s be clear: there are no easy answers to the deepest questions of suffering. Libraries overflow with the volumes that have been written to address these questions. Centuries of philosophers, pundits and preachers have reflected on the existence of evil, the meaning of pain and the role of God in suffering.

Centuries? More like millennia. In fact, some 300 years before the supposed birth of Jesus, a Greek philosopher by the name of Epicurus essentially laid out the most compelling argument regarding the notion of God’s relationship to evil ever made. His argument has yet to be refuted:

Either God wants to abolish evil, and cannot; or he can, but does not want to. If he wants to, but cannot, he is impotent. If he can, but does not want to, he is wicked. If God can abolish evil, and God really wants to do it, why is there evil in the world?

Your answer, sir?

The capacity to choose God and goodness came with the commensurate ability to choose evil. Is it loving to force his creation to follow his order, or to teach it and leave the creature to choose? It would seem that God came to the same conclusion that America’s founders did many millennia later: compulsory virtue is no virtue at all.

Ah yes, the old free will argument. God could eliminate all evil, but in doing so he would be subjugating us, and we wouldn’t have the ‘option’ to turn away from him. That’s all fine and good for the god of the Old Testament, who simply obliterates the unbeliever’s soul. The Christian god, unfortunately, has a rather unpleasant fate for anyone who exercises their own free will and chooses not to love an invisible tyrant. In his view, it is more moral to allow a person the right to choose their actions for a lifetime (however brief) than to torture that person forever for making the wrong ones. Sorry, your god sucks.

Let me suggest simply that God, in his sovereignty, has chosen to make our decisions meaningful. Consequently, much of what happens on earth neither conforms to, nor results from, his preference. There are at least four influences on human events: God’s will, to be sure; but also the will of Satan, our adversary; peoples’ choices, for better or for worse; and natural law (gravity, collision, combustion, and the like).

What a confusing mess of influences here. Why does Satan even exist? Sure, we make him out to be the bad guy, but it seems to me he’s simply the ‘bad cop’ to God’s ‘good cop’ routine. Without Satan there to look like the bad guy, you realize that by failing to rid the universe of this loathsome entity, he is in fact endorsing evil. Like Epicurus pointed out: if God is all powerful, and there is still evil, it is by his choice alone. One cannot condone evil without being part of it.

You don’t get nearly the same consternation in Burundi or Burma, because suffering is normal to them. God and hard times coexist intuitively there.

God likes to be where the action is, and there’s no greater place of suffering than Africa. And because tragedies are a regular occurrence there, Aurora isn’t a big deal. See, isn’t that a satisfying answer to the problem of evil? It isn’t?

The God of the Bible promises no exemption from suffering. In fact, he all but promises suffering. He does not suggest that his followers won’t go through fire, but rather that we won’t burn up.

What a deal! Sign me up for this omnipotent god who spends his time ‘grieving’ with me when my infant son dies of a highly treatable illness. Hopefully I got him baptized in time, or he’ll burn in hell!

Where was God in Aurora? He was on the lawn in front of the Civic Building as thousands gathered in solidarity, hope, and love at a packed prayer vigil last Sunday.

God was with those people who, powerless as they are, could do nothing but grieve. Sounds like the all powerful creator of the universe, doesn’t it?

Redemption has only begun in Aurora, and already God is everywhere. There will be beauty once this story is written that overshadows and transcends the ashes.

It’s doubtful any of this supposed beauty would make up for the innocent lives lost at something as peaceful and enjoyable as a movie. I would rather none of this happened rather than see an opportunity for human solidarity in the face of tragedy.

This is what a Creationist ‘argument’ looks like

There’s a part of me (a rather small and insignificant part) who admires the time and effort creationists employ trying to refute evolution. Think of how much time and effort these morons put into trying to prove that their invisible friend is in fact responsible for all the diversity of life on Earth. It’s an ambitious goal to say the least, but do you know what makes it easier? Inventing shit!

If Evolution is truly occurring, vestigial organs would not only exist, but they would greatly outnumber the fully functional ones…Since Evolution is a random, chance process, there must be numerous trial and error combinations until a functional organ or appendage is produced. Any of these “vestigial” organs would still be in existence in a multitude of species and individuals and there would be no doubt that Evolution is fact.

Why would vestigial organs outnumber functional ones? Because this guy thinks entire organs spontaneously appear due to random mutation! Forget the fact that his little ‘diagram’ seems to indicate a rather strong propensity for phalluses (just how many vestigial dicks can one man have?), why is ‘Evolution Man’ so damn wide? Are those eyeballs for nipples? Is it just me or would that be fucking awesome?

However, in the late 1800′s there were an estimated 150 vestigial parts in the human body. Supposedly anyone can claim that something is vestigial because it serves no apparent purpose and the individual can survive without it. Today there are no vestigial organs claimed for the human body! That is because in the last 100 years, medical science has found that there is indeed a purpose to everything in the human body.

Ummm, no it hasn’t. Of course, this moron has no real obligation to tell anyone the truth, but this idea that every human organ serves a purpose can quickly be disproven if you’ve ever had to go to the dentist to remove your ‘wisdom’ teeth. The reason they exist is once upon a time, your ancestors had bigger jaws, but thanks to the genius of evolution, there was no evolutionary pressure to loose these painful molars, and so every year, dentists pull out millions of those little suckers.

Creation says there will be zero vestigial organs while Evolution requires millions of them.

Creation also says the Earth is 6000 years old, about a few millenia after the invention of agriculture and the domestication of the dog. Now, it’s time to set up a straw man and knock that sucker down, baby!

This car engine [picture of a car] also has no vestigial parts because, like the human body, it too had a Creator! If something so complex as the human body could evolve by chance, then even more so could this automobile evolve by chance.

Evolution isn’t real because man invented a car! My logic is infallible! If that wasn’t enough to convince you, this bombshell will!

If you don’t believe God created all living things, male and female, in 6 days….
How many millions of years was it between the first male and the first female?

See, isn’t it easier to assume that magical daddy-man in the sky did it all over the span of a long work-week than the hard-to-understand process of evolution?

Dinosaurs are Satan’s way of deceiving us!

I know this question wasn’t asked of me, but I want to answer it anyway:

I’m a little shocked. She says she is a Christian, but the Bible doesn’t say anything about dinosaurs. Should I let him keep them, as long as he understands that dinosaurs aren’t real? Even the PBS shows that he watches talk about dinosaurs and evolution, and how the scientists found these “bones” but the Bible doesn’t say that God ever created them, and the earth is only 6000 years old, not old enough to have ‘bones” that they say are millions of years old! I know that Satan tries to trick us in many ways, and this is one way he tries to fool man into believing that there isn’t a God who created the universe. How can they be bones when they made out of ROCKS? I told my son that dinosaurs are one of Satan’s many ways of tricking man, and he must talk to God before he plays with them. Am I handling this right? My first 3 were girls, and I adopted boys, and lots of mothers tell me that boys are often attracted to these dinosaurs. So I don’t know what to do. Is this just harmless fantasy play for him, or should I be worried that he may go on believing in things like evolution?

Dear concerned idiot,

Since you posted this question on the Internet, let me answer by saying first there is almost no chance your pathetic, antiquated worldview will be inculcated on your infant son. It’s too late. Maybe if you totally disconnected from the World Wide Web and lived in a cave for a while, you might be able to halt the assault of information that we call the Internet. Unfettered access to information is the reason your religion is slowly dying off. It can’t possibly compete with the wealth of ideas the rest of the world has to offer.

If it’s any consolation, though, your relationship will face the inevitable strain your dogmatic belief entails, so rest assured that your son’s interest in dinosaurs is a positive sign of his intelligence and curiosity of the world beyond the confines of your limited schema. A wealth of experience and knowledge awaits him, if he’s lucky enough to receive even a basic education, which I’m sure you’ll do your best to prevent.

By the time you’re dead and he’s finally able to live his life free of your religious tyranny, he may have a few positive memories of you, though they will be clouded by your intense ignorance. In the meantime, I suggest you stop blaming your imaginary friend (or enemy) for everything you despise. Odds are, it’ll only drive a wedge between you and everyone else not living in your delusion.